Vlogging Update: May 2017

BIG EYES & MOUTH FIREPAINT.png

Hey y’all,

Sorry for the long absence.

My computer died.

I gave it to my aunt to work on.

She does IT work for the local school district.

Unable to fix it, she gave me another one that a school was getting rid of.

I tried to salvage what I could from the old one.

But, most of my programs and files were lost.

I’ve been searching for the missing software and restoring what I can.

My scanner/printer didn’t want to cooperate with the new computer.

I tried replacing it.

But, the replacements didn’t work either.

After a couple of days messing with it, I finally got it running.

My van has a million problems.

But, at least I got the front tire fixed that kept going flat.

I’ve replaced that tire THREE TIMES and it still kept going flat.

I thought maybe the rim was bent.

I had it looked at and they found a piece of metal lodged inside.

They patched it up.

Now, it shouldn’t be a problem anymore.

Only cost me $15 bucks (thank God)!

I tried to repay my grandmother $700 dollars I owe her.

She forgave some of it.

My ex forgave the $200 I owed her, too, since I’ve been helping her relocate and move her stuff.

Not sure how I’ll get my other debts paid.

But, I try not to get stressed out about it.

That really fucks up my creativity.

Spring Has Sprung

20160328_110748

I was watching some YouTube videos lately.

I got very annoyed.

Other bands are doing stuff that I wanna do.

But, they keep beating me to it.

I hate when that shit happens.

Maybe it is just that everything has already been done to death and we keep repeating and reinterpreting what came before us.

I dunno.

I know that, financially, I am gonna be screwed for the foreseeable future.

I am robbing Peter to pay Paul for as long as I have to.

I seriously doubt that I will break even before summer begins.

I keep putting off working on and publishing the zine until I can get ahead a little.

But, that doesn’t look like it is going to happen very soon.

I may do a cheaper version, than what I had in mind, until it begins to pay for itself.

Just a thought.

I will probably raid my boxes of old tapes that I have in storage and dig around for some incomplete material to finish.

I have a lot of it, going back nearly forty years.

Since I have been tinkering with the analogue multi-track machine, maybe I will include some fresher stuff with it, too.

I dunno.

A guitarist whom I have not played with in years contacted me and is eager to jam again.

So, maybe he can give me a morale boost and help me get my shit done.

Maybe.

I am always willing to jam with other people if they are interested.

I need to find somewhere that I can paint and make loud noises too.

Maybe somebody can help me with that.

Jackie O., A “Conspiracy Nut”?

Jackie O., A “Conspiracy Nut”?

Chuck Baldwin
Aug 28, 2011
Tapes that were recorded within months of President John F. Kennedy’s assassination and that have been sealed in a vault at the Kennedy Library in Boston are soon to be released. In the tapes, former First Lady Jackie Kennedy reveals that she believed Vice President Lyndon Baines Johnson and other influential individuals orchestrated the Dallas shooting that killed her husband.
Jackie went on to marry Greek shipping tycoon Aristotle Onassis, of course. Mrs. Kennedy had ordered that the tapes should not be released until 50 years after her death. She died 17 years ago from cancer at the age of 64. Now, her daughter, Caroline Kennedy, has agreed to release the recordings early. According to press reports, the tapes will be aired by ABC and by British broadcasters as well. The tapes are also said to reveal illicit affairs by both President Kennedy and Jackie.
According to DailyMail, “Jackie Onassis believed that Lyndon B. Johnson and a cabal of Texas tycoons were involved in the assassination of her husband John F. Kennedy, ‘explosive’ recordings are set to reveal.
“The secret tapes will show that the former first lady felt that her husband’s successor was at the heart of the plot to murder him.
“She became convinced that the then vice president, along with businessmen in the South, had orchestrated the Dallas shooting, with gunman Lee Harvey Oswald–long claimed to have been a lone assassin–merely part of a much larger conspiracy.”
See the DailyMail report at:
http://tinyurl.com/3ovu7z4
So, now I suppose we can add Jackie-Kennedy-Onassis to the list of “conspiracy nuts.” Right? Isn’t that what anyone is called who believes that the federal government hides the truth about what happens and conjures up a convenient “official” story to sell to the American people? Isn’t that what the media calls anyone who dares to question any “official” report? Isn’t that what Glenn Beck calls them? Isn’t that what Joe Scarborough calls them? Isn’t that what Bill O’Reilly calls them? Isn’t that what Rush Limbaugh calls them? They are “conspiracy nuts.” Right? I wonder if we will now hear any of these talking heads call Jackie Onassis a “conspiracy nut”?
And since we are talking about conspiracies, I want to go ahead and just say up front: I believe that anyone who thinks that there are no conspiracies that many times involve people and agencies at the highest levels of government and business is downright simple minded, willingly ignorant, incredibly naïve, or has a personal, vested reason to remain clueless.
The John F. Kennedy Assassination
Is there really anyone reading this column who actually believes the “official” story that Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated President Kennedy in the manner in which he is purportedly to have done it: all by himself? Get real! Now we know that even Jackie Kennedy, who was in the limo when her husband was killed, didn’t believe it!
I further believe that the assassination of John Kennedy was a major turning point in US history. It was at this point that a criminal cabal wrested control of the federal government from the hands of “We the People” and turned it into a giant mafia. I don’t believe the people and their representatives in Washington, D.C., have had much to do with their federal government (especially at the executive level) ever since.
TWA Flight 800 “Explosion”
While we are talking about conspiracies, let’s just go ahead a mention a few more. Do you really believe the “official” story of the crash of TWA flight 800 in 1996? What if an American missile accidentally shot down that jetliner? Do you really think the federal government would come clean about it?
Read this report from The Washington Weekly, if you are willing to be enlightened:
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/twa.html
Oklahoma City Bombing
Do readers really believe the “official” story that Timothy McVeigh acted alone in igniting the explosion that took down the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, and that there was no cover-up as to what actually happened? I don’t.
Here are a couple places to get started on this one:
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/bomb.html
And:
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/key.html
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

9/11 Twin Towers and Pentagon Attacks
There has been so much written on this subject, I will let readers fend for themselves as to personal research on the matter. Without wading too deeply into this discussion (and for the sake of column space), let me ask just one simple question. Pray tell, what took down Building 7? To this good hour, I have not heard one single plausible explanation proffered by any government or media representative that explains why Building 7 collapsed.
Do I believe that the government is purposefully keeping the American people in the dark as to what really happened on 9/11/01? You bet I do! Do I believe that there is a cover-up of crucial evidence related to 9/11 by both the federal government and the national news media? You bet I do!
Haiti Earthquake
Another event that the “official” version is just completely unbelievable to me is the earthquake in Haiti in January of last year. I will always believe that there was so much to this story that we were not being told. It didn’t “smell” right to me when it happened; it doesn’t “smell” right to me now. If you’re interested, try perusing through some of this information:
http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/?page_id=855
Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syrian Wars
Let me round out my personal list of conspiracies with all the wars America is waging in the Middle East. I believe virtually every reason George W. Bush gave the American people for attacking and invading Iraq was a premeditated, bald-faced lie! I believe the so-called “war on terror” (and the “war on drugs,” for that matter) that justifies endless wars abroad and endless surveillance at home is completely manufactured by those in government and business for personal economic and political interests.
In fact, if you really want to get sick to your stomach over what this so-called “war on terror” is accomplishing, take a look at this report:
http://tinyurl.com/3wzo9mn
So, nearly 50 years since President John F. Kennedy was assassinated, we now learn that First Lady Jackie Kennedy believed that there was a conspiracy to kill her husband and that Lyndon Johnson was neck-deep in it. I wonder what future generations will learn about many of these other “official” stories of the federal government that just didn’t add up?
And wouldn’t it be nice if the national news media were actually honest and interested in the truth and would do their jobs to inform the American people as to what is truly going on in their federal government? Of course, if they did, the American people would probably tar and feather the whole bunch and start all over! Hmm. Sounds kind of inviting, doesn’t it? I bet Jackie would agree.
P.S. If readers are still skeptical of how many “conspiracy theories” are, in reality, “conspiracy facts,” I urge you to read this enlightening column:
http://tinyurl.com/3swqcka

Digg!

Sotomayor Issues Challenge to a Century of Corporate Law

Sotomayor Issues Challenge to a Century of Corporate Law
By JESS BRAVIN
WASHINGTON — In her maiden Supreme Court appearance last week, Justice Sonia Sotomayor made a provocative comment that probed the foundations of corporate law.

During arguments in a campaign-finance case, the court’s majority conservatives seemed persuaded that corporations have broad First Amendment rights and that recent precedents upholding limits on corporate political spending should be overruled.

Sonia Sotomayor

But Justice Sotomayor suggested the majority might have it all wrong — and that instead the court should reconsider the 19th century rulings that first afforded corporations the same rights flesh-and-blood people have.

Judges “created corporations as persons, gave birth to corporations as persons,” she said. “There could be an argument made that that was the court’s error to start with…[imbuing] a creature of state law with human characteristics.”

After a confirmation process that revealed little of her legal philosophy, the remark offered an early hint of the direction Justice Sotomayor might want to take the court.

“Progressives who think that corporations already have an unduly large influence on policy in the United States have to feel reassured that this was one of [her] first questions,” said Douglas Kendall, president of the liberal Constitutional Accountability Center.

“I don’t want to draw too much from one comment,” says Todd Gaziano, director of the Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at the conservative Heritage Foundation. But it “doesn’t give me a lot of confidence that she respects the corporate form and the type of rights that it should be afforded.”

For centuries, corporations have been considered beings apart from their human owners, yet sharing with them some attributes, such as the right to make contracts and own property. Originally, corporations were a relatively rare form of organization. The government granted charters to corporations, delineating their specific functions. Their powers were presumed limited to those their charter spelled out.

“A corporation is an artificial being, invisible, intangible,” Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in an 1819 case. “It possesses only those properties which the charter of its creation confers upon it.”

But as the Industrial Revolution took hold, corporations proliferated and views of their functions began to evolve.

In an 1886 tax dispute between the Southern Pacific Railroad and the state of California, the court reporter quoted Chief Justice Morrison Waite telling attorneys to skip arguments over whether the 14th Amendment’s equal-protection clause applied to corporations, because “we are all of opinion that it does.”

That seemingly off-hand comment reflected an “impulse to shield business activity from certain government regulation,” says David Millon, a law professor at Washington and Lee University.

“A positive way to put it is that the economy is booming, American production is leading the world and the courts want to promote that,” Mr. Millon says. Less charitably, “it’s all about protecting corporate wealth” from taxes, regulations or other legislative initiatives.

Subsequent opinions expanded corporate rights. In 1928, the court struck down a Pennsylvania tax on transportation corporations because individual taxicab drivers were exempt. Corporations get “the same protection of equal laws that natural persons” have, Justice Pierce Butler wrote.

From the mid-20th century, though, the court has vacillated on how far corporate rights extend. In a 1973 case before a more liberal court, Justice William O. Douglas rejected the Butler opinion as “a relic” that overstepped “the narrow confines of judicial review” by second-guessing the legislature’s decision to tax corporations differently than individuals.

Today, it’s “just complete confusion” over which rights corporations can claim, says Prof. William Simon of Columbia Law School.

Even conservatives sometimes have been skeptical of corporate rights. Then-Associate Justice William Rehnquist dissented in 1979 from a decision voiding Massachusetts’s restriction of corporate political spending on referendums. Since corporations receive special legal and tax benefits, “it might reasonably be concluded that those properties, so beneficial in the economic sphere, pose special dangers in the political sphere,” he wrote.

On today’s court, the direction Justice Sotomayor suggested is unlikely to prevail. During arguments, the court’s conservative justices seem to view corporate political spending as beneficial to the democratic process. “Corporations have lots of knowledge about environment, transportation issues, and you are silencing them during the election,” Justice Anthony Kennedy said during arguments last week.

But Justice Sotomayor may have found a like mind in Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. “A corporation, after all, is not endowed by its creator with inalienable rights,” Justice Ginsburg said, evoking the Declaration of Independence.

How far Justice Sotomayor pursues the theme could become clearer when the campaign-finance decision is delivered, probably by year’s end.

Write to Jess Bravin at jess.bravin@wsj.com

Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A19
Copyright 2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008

And here’s a link to Stephen Colbert’s video bit, “Corporations Are People Too”:

The Colbert Report Mon – Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
The Word – Let Freedom Ka-Ching
www.colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full Episodes Political Humor Health Care Protests


Digg!

With One Simple Sentence, ABC News Confirms The Death of Beltway Journalism

With One Simple Sentence, ABC News Confirms The Death of Beltway Journalism
from The Full Feed from HuffingtonPost.com by Eric Boehlert

It’s from an online report about the Obama school “controversy,” and it’s written by Dan Harris. In his piece, Harris notes that conservatives pre-emptively blasted Obama’s stay-in-school speech even though conservatives had no idea what was going to be in the speech. Harris notes that the speech itself “turned out to be little more than a pep talk on the importance of staying in school.”

Later in the piece as he tries to put the “controversy” in context, Harris uncorks this era-defining gem [emphasis added]:

While the media loves a good fight — even when the charges are unfounded — there may be more to conservatives’ complaints that play into larger concerns about the president on health care reform.
Behold the wonder. Pretty much sums up the state of affairs, right? “The media loves a good fight–even when the charges are unfounded.”

And do I even have to mention that the media’s new-found love of unfounded fights is an Obama era special. Or can somebody point me towards the manufactured, unfounded “controversies” hatched during the Bush years that the press treated as big news. (As I’ve noted, when conservatives–and overwhelming white–activists get mad, it’s news. When liberals do it, it’s annoying.)

If that weren’t bad enough, there were other depressing nuggets from Harris’ woeful report. First, he quoted three partisan Obama critics in the story, yet somehow managed to avoid a single Democrat or Obama supporter for his report.

And second, then there was this:

While Obama may have run a successful presidential campaign, critics say the White House has been unprepared for the ferocity of the Republican opposition.
“You have to be aware of the opposition that is going to arise and have a plan to deal with it,” [former Gov. Mitt Romney spokesman Kevin] Madden said.

Did you get that? According to a partisan Republican, the Obama WH was to blame for the school “controversy,” because it should have seen the firestorm coming. It should have known that by having the President of the United States address school children and urge them to excel and stay in school, that Republicans and wingnuts would accuse him of trying to “indoctrinate” kids with a “socialist” agenda.

I mean really, how did the WH not see that one coming, right?

So to summarize: ABC News confirms that it will chase any right-wing “fight” even if it’s baseless; even if it’s “unfounded.” In reporting those fights, ABC News will purposefully exclude Democrat voices from the story. And ABC News, while acknowledging a fight is “unfounded,” will allow partisan Republicans to blame the White House for the “controversy.”

R.I.P., indeed.

Crossposted at County Fair, a Media Matters blog.

Follow Eric Boehlert on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/EricBoehlert


Digg!

Breaking Three Years of Silence: Alex Jones Interviews Charlie Sheen

Breaking Three Years of Silence: Alex Jones Interviews Charlie Sheen

Kurt Nimmo
Prison Planet.com
Wednesday, September 9, 2009

In the audio clip below, aired today on the Alex Jones Show, Charlie Sheen, popular actor and winner of the Golden Globe for Best Performance by an Actor In A Television Series, tells Alex Jones why he wrote “20 Minutes with the President,” an open letter to president Barack Obama calling for a new investigation into the September 11, 2001, attacks.

“Enough stonewalling,” Sheen told Jones, “enough media manipulation, enough media-mantra speak. The families deserve better, America deserves better.”

Charlie said he cannot sit idly by and hope that a new investigation will “fall out of the heavens and into our Congress.” We must demand Obama deliver “honest promises,” Sheen explained. We must demand a new investigation.

Alex mentioned John Farmer, a senior counsel to the 9/11 Commission, who revealed earlier this year that the government agreed not to tell the truth about 9/11. Other members have said that the Pentagon and the government were engaged in deliberate deception about their response to the attack. Farmer’s book about his experiences working for the Commission is entitled The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11, and is set to be released this month (see Paul Joseph Watson, 9/11 Commission Counsel: Government Agreed to Lie About 9/11).

Charlie said the call for a new investigation will not be silenced by the corporate media. “This message will not be silence anymore by the media-fueled mantras insisting on how they feel and deciding for them [the American people and most importantly the victim family members] for eight long years what can thought, what can be said, what can be asked..”

Alex noted that even as the whitewash commission conducted its hearings, there were outraged family members in the audience demanding the truth be told. Charlie added that these family members were ignored by the commission and thus deeply offended. The questions they asked “never saw the light of day” and their words never found their way into the final report generated by the commission, itself a fraud as Farmer others have noted. “We know that [the families] have been calling for a new investigation,” Sheen noted.

The government is demanding the public suspend logical thought and dismiss all questions about the investigation’s report, which is a work of fiction, in essence a fairy tale, Charlie argued. The establishment, he said, demands we worship a new form of physics and accept a “new form of reality that is inconsistent with everything we know in each and every cell of our entire being.” The American people are instructed by the government to believe such obvious nonsense and then are systematically demonized for asking questions, he explained.

The official 9/11 story is “an absolute fairy tale,” Charlie declared, “a complete work of fiction, and not even a very good one.”

Sheen hopes “20 Minutes with the President” will get Obama’s attention. “If for some reason this doesn’t make it into his hands and I am never granted 20 minutes with my president, I would urge the American people — I would urge anybody and everybody that has a stake in this, which would be all of us — to continue to apply the pressure, to continue to ask the questions, to continue to demand the truth.”

Charlie Sheen will further expand on his open letter this Friday on the Alex Jones Show.


Digg!

Twenty Minutes with the President

Twenty Minutes with the President

Reported by Charlie Sheen
Infowars
Tuesday, September 8, 2009

I recently had the pleasure of sitting down with our 44th President of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama, while he was out promoting his health care reform initiative. I requested 30 minutes given the scope and detail of my inquiry; they said I could have 20. Twenty minutes, 1200 seconds, not a lot of time to question the President about one of the most important events in our nation’s history. The following is a transcript of our remarkable discussion.

————————————————————————————————————————

Charlie Sheen – Good afternoon Mr. President, thank you so much for taking time out of your demanding schedule.

President Barack Obama – My pleasure, the content of your request seemed like something I should carve out a few minutes for.

CS – I should point out that I voted for you, as your promises of hope and change, transparency and accountability, as well as putting government back into the hands of the American people, struck an emotional chord in me that I hadn’t felt in quite some time, perhaps ever.

PBO – And I appreciate that Charlie. Big fan of the show, by the way.

CS – Sir, I can’t imagine when you might find the time to actually watch my show given the measure of what you inherited.

PBO – I have it Tivo’d on Air Force One. Nice break from the traveling press corps. (He glances at his watch) not to be abrupt or to rush you, but you have 19 minutes left.

CS – I’ll take that as an invitation to cut to the chase.

PBO – I’m all ears. Or so I’ve been told.

CS – Sir, in the very near future we will be experiencing our first 9/11 anniversary with you as Commander in Chief.

PBO – Yes. A very solemn day for our Nation. A day of reflection and yet a day of historical consciousness as well.

CS – Very much so sir, very much so indeed…. Now; In researching your position regarding the events of 9/11 and the subsequent investigation that followed, am I correct to understand that you fully support and endorse the findings of the commission report otherwise known as the ‘official story’?

PBO – Do I have any reason not to? Given that most of us are presumably in touch with similar evidence.

CS – I really wish that were the case, sir. Are you aware, Mr. President, of the recent stunning revelations that sixty percent of the 9/11 commissioners have publicly stated that the government agreed not to tell the truth about 9/11 and that the Pentagon was engaged in deliberate deception about their response to the attack?

PBO – I am aware of certain “in fighting” during the course of their very thorough and tireless investigative process.

CS – Mr. President, it’s hard to label this type of friction as “in fighting” or make the irresponsible leap to “thorough,” when the evidence I insist you examine regarding 6 of the 10 members are statements of fact.

(At this point one of Obama’s senior aides approaches the President and whispers into his ear. Obama glances quickly at his watch and nods as the aide resumes his post at the doorway, directly behind me.)

PBO – No disrespect Mr. Sheen, but I have to ask; what is it that you seem to be implying with the initial direction of this discussion?

CS – I am not implying anything Mr. President. I am here to present the facts and see what you plan to do with them.

PBO – Let me guess; your ‘facts,’ allegedly supporting these claims are in the folders you brought with you?

CS – Good guess Mr. President.

(I hand the first folder of documents to the President)

CS – Again sir, these are not my opinions or assumptions, this is all a matter of public record, reported through mainstream media, painstakingly fact checked and verified.

(the President glances into the folder I handed him)

CS – You’ll notice sir on page one of the dossier dated August of ‘06 from the Washington Post, the statements of John Farmer, senior council to the 9/11 commission, his quote stating, “I was shocked how different the truth was from the way it was described.”

PBO – (as he glances down at the report, almost inaudible) …. um hmm….

CS – He goes on to further state “The [NORAD Air Defense] tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years….”

(the President continues to view the documents)

CS – On pages two and three, sir, are the statements, as well, from commission co-chairmen Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, commissioners Bob Kerrey, Timothy Roemer and John Lehman, as well as the statements of commissioner Max Cleland, an ex-Senator from Georgia , who resigned, stating:

“It is a national scandal. This investigation is now compromised. One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9/11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up.”

He also described President Bush’s desire to delay the process as not to damage the ‘04 re-election bid. They suspected deception to the point where they considered referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation. Mr. President, this information alone is unequivocally grounds for a new investigation!

PBO – Mistakes were clearly made but we as a people and as a country need to move forward. It is obviously in our best interest as a democratic society to focus our efforts and our resources on the future of this great nation and our ability to protect the American people and our allies from this type of terrorism in the coming years.

CS – Sir, how can we focus on the future when THE COMMISSION ITSELF is on record stating that they still do not know the truth??

PBO – Even if what you state, might in some capacity, begin to approach an open discussion or balanced debate, I can’t speak for, or about the decisions certain commission members made during an extremely difficult period. Perhaps you should be interviewing them instead of me. Wait, don’t tell me; I was easier to track down than they were?

CS – Not exactly sir, but let’s be honest. You’re the President of the United States, the leader of the free world, the buck stops with you. 9/11 has been the pretext for the systematic dismantling of our Constitution and Bill of Rights. Your administration is reading from the same playbook that the Bush administration foisted on America through documented secrecy and deception.

PBO – Mr. Sheen, I’m having a difficult time sitting here and listening to you draw distorted parallels between the Bush/Cheney regime and mine.

CS – Mr. President the parallels are not distorted just because you say they are. Let’s stick to the facts. You promised to abolish the Patriot Act and then voted to re-authorize it. You pledged to end warrantless wire tapping against the American people and now energetically defend it. You decried the practice of rendition and now continue it. You promised over and over again on the campaign trail, that you would end the practice of indefinite detention and instead, you have expanded it to permanent detention of “detainees” without trial. This far exceeds the outrages of the former administration. Call me crazy Mr. President, but is this not your record?

PBO – Mr. Sheen, my staff and I authorized this interview based on your request to discuss 9/11 and deliver some additional information you’re convinced I’d not previously reviewed. Call me crazy, But it appears as though you’ve blindly wandered off topic.

CS – Sir, the examples I just illustrated are a direct result of 9/11.

PBO – And I’m telling you that we must move forward, we must endure through these dangerous and politically challenging years ahead.

CS – Mr. President, we cannot move forward with a bottomless warren of unanswered questions surrounding that day and its aftermath.

PBO – I read the official report. Every word every page. Perhaps you should do the same.

CS – I have sir, and so have thousands of family members of the victims, and guess what; they have the same questions I do and probably a lot more. I didn’t lose a loved one on that horrific day Mr. President and neither did you. But since then I, along with millions of other Americans lost something we held true and dear for most of our lives in this great country of ours; we lost our hope.

PBO – And I’d like to believe that I am here to restore that hope. To restore confidence in your leaders, in the system that the voting public chose through a peaceful transfer of power.

(An odd moment of silence between us. Precious time ticking away).

CS – Mr. President, are you aware of the number of days it took to begin the investigation into JFK’s assassination?

PBO – If memory serves I believe it was two weeks.

CS – Close. Seventeen days to be exact. Are you aware sir, how long it took to begin the investigation into Pearl Harbor?

PBO – I would say again about….two weeks.

CS – Close again sir, eleven days to be exact. Are you aware Mr. President how long it took to begin the investigation into 9/11?

PBO – I know it must have seemed like a very long time for all the grieving families.

CS – It was a very long time Mr. President – four hundred and forty days. Roughly 14 months. Does it bother you Mr. President that it only took FIVE HOURS for Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld after the initial attack to recommend and endorse a full scale offensive against Iraq?

PBO – I am not aware of any such purported claim.

CS – I have the proof Mr. President, along with scores of documents and facts I’d like you to take a look at. Here.

(I hand him another file – much thicker than the first)

PBO – I see you came prepared Charlie.

CS – No other way to show up Mr. President. When in doubt over prepare I always say.

PBO – Now you sound like the First Lady.

CS – That’s quite a compliment sir.

PBO – As you wish. Please continue.

CS – Sir, I’d like to direct your attention to the stack of documents in the folder I just handed you. The first in from the top is entitled “ Operation Northwoods“, a declassified Pentagon plan to stage terror attacks on US soil, to be blamed on Cuba as a pretext for war.

PBO – And I’d like to direct your attention to the fact that the principle draftsman of this improbable blueprint was quickly denied a second term as Joint Chiefs chairman and sent packing to a European NATO garrison. Thank God his otherworldly ambitions never saw the light of day.

CS – I wouldn’t be so certain about that Mr. President.

PBO – I could easily say the same to you Charlie.

(the President checks his watch)

CS – The next document reads “Declassified staged provocations.” Now, Honestly Mr. President I wish I was making this stuff up. I’m certain you are familiar with the USS Maine Incident, the sinking of the Lusitania, which we all now know brought us into WW1, and of course the most famous, the Gulf of Tonkin incident.

PBO – Of course I am familiar with these historical events and I’m aware that there’s a measure of controversy surrounding them. But to be quite frank with you, this is all ancient history.

CS – Mr. President, it has been often said; “Those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it.” And I concede to you sir, these events are the past.

PBO – A vastly different world young man, shouldering a radically disparate state of universal affairs.

CS – No argument sir, I’m merely inviting you to acknowledge some credibility to the pattern or the theme. Case in point; the next document in your folder. It was published by the think-tank, Project For a New American Century and it’s entitled “ Rebuilding Americas Defenses“, and was written by Dick Cheney and Jeb Bush. To quote from the document sir – (the President interrupts)

PBO – “Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.”

CS – Touche, sir. Your thoughts on this statement Mr. President?

PBO – I would call this a blatant case of misjudgment fueled by an unfortunate milieu of assumption. For some, the uninformed denial of coincidence.

CS – Interesting angle sir. Nevertheless, Vice President Cheney didn’t stop there. In early 2008, Pulitzer prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh and MSNBC, both reported that Cheney had proposed to the Pentagon an outrageous plan to have the U.S. Navy create fake Iranian patrol boats, to be manned by Navy Seals, who would then stage an attack on US destroyers in the Strait of Hormuz. This event was to be blamed on Iran and used as a pretext for war. Does any of this information worry you Mr. President? Should we just ignore it, until these realities can be dismissed years from now by our children, as ancient history as well?

PBO – Of course this information worries me, yet it’s not nearly as worrisome as you sitting here today suspiciously implying that 9/11 was somehow allowed to happen or even orchestrated from the inside.

CS – Mr. President I am not suspiciously implying anything. I am merely exposing the documents and asking the questions that nobody in power will even look at or acknowledge. And as I stated earlier, I voted for you, I believed in your message of hope and change. Mr. President I have come to you specifically hoping for a change. A change in the perception that our government has not yet made itself open and accountable to the people. These are your words Mr. President not mine. The lives of thousands were brutally cut short and those left behind to suffer their infinite pain are with me today Mr. President. They are with me in spirit and flesh, and the message we carry will not be silenced anymore by media fueled mantras insisting how they are supposed to feel. Deciding for them, for 8 long years, what can be thought, what can be said, what can be asked.

PBO – And I appreciate your passion, I appreciate your conviction. In spite of your concerns, in spite of what your data might or might not reveal, what you and the families must understand and accept is that we are doing everything we can to protect you.

CS – Mr. President , I realize were very short on time, so please allow me to run down a list of bullet points that might illuminate some reasons why we don’t embrace the warm hug of Federal protection.

PBO – We’ve come this far. Fire away.

CS – Please keep in mind Mr. President everything I’m about to say is documented as fact and part of the public record. The information you are holding in your hands chronicles and verifies each and every point.

PBO – You have five minutes left. The floor is yours. Brief me.

CS – Thank you Mr. President. Okay, first; On the FBI’s most wanted list Osama Bin Laden is not charged with the crimes of 911. When I called the FBI to ask them why this was the case, they replied: “There’s not enough evidence to link Bin Laden to the crime scene,” I later discovered he had never even been indicted by the D.O.J.

CS – Number 2; FBI translator Sibel Edmonds, was dismissed and gagged by the D.O.J. after she revealed that the government had foreknowledge of plans to attack American cities using planes as bombs as early as April 2001. In July of ‘09, Mrs. Edmonds broke the Federal gag order and went public to reveal that Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaeda and the Taliban were all working for and with the C.I.A. up until the day of 9/11.

CS – Number 3; The following is a quote from Mayor Giuliani during an interview on 9/11 with Peter Jennings for ABC News. “I went down to the scene and we set up headquarters at 75 Barkley Street, which was right there with the Police Commissioner, the Fire Commissioner, the Head of Emergency Management, and we were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was going to collapse. And it did collapse before we could actually get out of the building, so we were trapped in the building for 10, 15 minutes, and finally found an exit and got out, walked north, and took a lot of people with us.”

WHO TOLD HIM THIS??? To this day, the answer to this question remains unanswered, completely ignored and emphatically DENIED by Mayor Giuliani on several public occasions.

CS – Number 4; In April 2004, USA Today reported, “In the two years before the Sept. 11 attacks, the North American Aerospace Defense Command conducted exercises simulating what the White House says was unimaginable at the time: hijacked airliners used as weapons to crash into targets and cause mass casualties.” One of the targets was the World Trade Center.

CS – Number 5; On September 12th 2007, CNN’s ‘Anderson Cooper 360′, reported that the mysterious “white plane” spotted and videotaped by multiple media outlets, flying in restricted airspace over the White House shortly before 10am on the morning of 9/11, was in fact the Air Force’s E-4B, a specially modified Boeing 747 with a communications pod behind the cockpit; otherwise known as “The Doomsday Plane”.

Though fully aware of the event, the 9/11 Commission did not deem the appearance of the military plane to be of any interest and did not include it in the final 9/11 Commission report.

CS – Number 6; Three F-16s assigned to Andrews Air Force Base, ten miles from Washington, DC, are conducting training exercises in North Carolina 207 miles away as the first plane crashes into the WTC. Even at significantly less than their top speed of 1500 mph, they could still have defended the skies over Washington well before 9am, more than 37 minutes before Flight 77 crashes into the Pentagon, however, they did not return until after 9:55am.

Andrews AFB had no armed fighters on alert and ready to take off on the morning of 9/11.

CS – Number 7; WTC Building 7. Watch the video of its collapse.

CS – Number 8; Flight 93 is fourth plane to crash on 9/11 at 10:03am. V.P. Cheney only gives shoot down order at 10:10-10:20am and this is not communicated to NORAD until 28 minutes after Flight 93 has crashed.

Fueling further suspicion on this front is the fact that three months before the attacks of 9/11, Dick Cheney usurped control of NORAD, and therefore he, and no one else on planet Earth, had the power to call for military sorties on the hijacked airliners on 9/11. He did not exercise that power. Three months after 9/11, he relinquished command of NORAD and returned it to military operation.

CS – Number 9; Scores of main stream news outlets reported that the F.B.I. conducted an investigation of at least FIVE of the 9/11 hijackers being trained at U.S. military flight schools. Those investigations are now sealed and need to be declassified.

CS – Number 10; In 2004, New York firefighters Mike Bellone and Nicholas DeMasi went public to say they had found the black boxes at the World Trade Center, but were told to keep their mouths shut by FBI agents. Nicholas DeMasi said that he escorted federal agents on an all-terrain vehicle in October 2001 and helped them locate the devices, a story backed up by rescue volunteer Mike Bellone.

As the Philadelphia Daily News reported at the time, “Their story raises the question of whether there was a some type of cover-up at Ground Zero.”

CS – Number 11 – Hundreds of eye witnesses including first responders, fire captains, news reporters, and police, all described multiple explosions in both towers before and during the collapse.

CS – Number 12; An astounding video uncovered from the archives shows BBC News correspondent Jane Standley reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. Tapes from earlier BBC broadcasts show news anchors discussing the collapse of WTC 7 a full 26 minutes in advance. The BBC at first claimed that their tapes from 9/11 had been “lost” before admitting that they made the “error” of reporting the collapse of WTC 7 before it happened without adequately explaining how they could have obtained advance knowledge of the event.

In addition, over an hour before the collapse of WTC 7, at 4:10pm, CNN’s Aaron Brown reported that the building “has either collapsed, or is collapsing.”

CS – Number 13; Solicitor General Ted Olson’s claim that his wife Barbara Olsen called him twice from Flight 77, describing hijackers with box cutters, was a central plank of the official 9/11 story.

However, the credibility of the story was completely undermined after Olsen kept changing his story about whether his wife used her cell phone or the airplane phone. The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004. American Airlines confirmed that Flight 77 was a Boeing 757 and that this plane did not have airplane phones on board.

According to the FBI, Barbara Olsen attempted to call her husband only once and the call failed to connect, therefore Olsen must have been lying when he claimed he had spoken to his wife from Flight 77.

CS – Number 14; The size of a Boeing 757 is approximately 125ft in width and yet images of the impact zone at the Pentagon supposedly caused by the crash merely show a hole no more than 16ft in diameter. The engines of the 757 would have punctured a hole bigger than this, never mind the whole plane. Images before the partial collapse of the impact zone show little real impact damage and a sparse debris field completely inconsistent with the crash of a large jetliner, especially when contrasted with other images showing airplane crashes into buildings.

CS – Number 15; What is the meaning behind the following quote attributed to Dick Cheney which came to light during the 9/11 Commission hearings? The passage is taken from testimony given by then Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta.

During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, “The plane is 50 miles out.” “The plane is 30 miles out.” And when it got down to “the plane is 10 miles out,” the young man also said to the Vice President, “Do the orders still stand?” And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, “Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?”

As the plane was not shot down, in addition to the fact that armed fighter jets were nowhere near the plane and the Pentagon defensive system was not activated, are we to take it that the orders were to let the plane find its target?

CS – Number 16; In May 2003, the Miami Herald reported how the Bush administration was refusing to release a 900-page congressional report on 9/11 because it wanted to “avoid enshrining embarrassing details in the report,” particularly regarding pre-9/11 warnings as well as the fact that the hijackers were trained at U.S. flight schools.

CS – Number 17; Top Pentagon officials cancelled their scheduled flights for September 11th on September 10th. San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, following a security warning, cancelled a flight into New York that was scheduled for the morning of 9/11.

CS – Number 18; The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004, and even by that point it was only in the trial phase. Calls from cell phones which formed an integral part of the official government version of events were technologically impossible at the time.

CS – Number 19: On April 29, 2004, President Bush and V.P. Cheney would only meet with the commission under specific clandestine conditions. They insisted on testifying together and not under oath. They also demanded that their testimony be treated as a matter of “state secret.” To date, nothing they spoke of that day exists in the public domain.

CS – And finally Mr. President – Number 20; A few days after the attack, several newspapers as well as the FBI reported that a paper passport had been found in the ruins of the WTC. In August 2004, CNN reported that 9/11 hijacker Ziad Jarrah’s visa was found in the remains of Flight 93 which went down in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.

At least a third of the WTC victim’s bodies were vaporized and many of the victims of the Pentagon incident were burned beyond recognition. And yet visas and paper passports which identify the perpetrators and back up the official version of events miraculously survive explosions and fires that we are told melted steel buildings.

(The Senior aide appears again beside the President whispering in his ear. He then quickly moves off).

PBO – Well Charlie I can’t say this hasn’t been interesting. As I said earlier you’ve showed up today focused and organized. Regardless how I feel about the material you’ve presented, I must commend your dedication and zeal. However, our time here is up.

(the President rises from his chair , I do the same).

CS – Mr. President! One more second!

(The President starts towards the door – I follow him quickly step for step).

CS – Mr. President, I implore you based on the evidence you now possess, to use your Executive Power. Prove to us all Sir, that you do, in fact, care. Create a truly comprehensive and open Congressional investigation of 9/11 and its aftermath. The families deserve the truth, the American people and the rest of the free world deserve the truth. Mr. President –

(He pauses. We shake hands).

CS – Make sure you’re on the right side of history.

(The President breaks the handshake).

PBO – I am on the right side of history. Thank you Charlie, my staff and I will be in touch.

(I watch as he strides gracefully out of the room, the truth I provided him held firmly by his side; in the hand of providence.)

————————————————————————————————————————

A comprehensive bibliography containing all of the evidence presented above can be viewed at http://www.prisonplanet.com/20_minutes_bibliography.html

Get this interview in PDF format here.

Author’s Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet.

This is an open letter to the President requesting a new investigation.

Charlie Sheen.

Charlie Sheen is going to be on Alex Jones’ syndicated radio show live twice this week. This letter to the President is only the opening salvo in a chain of key events. Read more details here and tune in at 11am CST when Alex will lay out this exciting new development. Sheen first appeared on The Alex Jones Show in March 2006 to air his doubts about the official 9/11 story, an interview that garnered national attention and put the issue of 9/11 truth at the forefront of public debate.

For media requests on this subject email sheen@infowars.com.


Digg!

Activist Releases Archive of Suppressed News Videos

Activist Releases Archive of Suppressed News Videos

James Corbett
The Corbett Report
Wednesday, Sept 2, 2009

In a move sure to send shockwaves through the online activist community, Jonathon Elinoff—activist, researcher, and the filmmaker behind the Core of Corruption documentary series—has released a video archive of dozens of network news broadcasts detailing controversial and suppressed news stories.

The archive, compiled over a period of several years, features actual network news coverage of the Trilateral Commission, the shadow government that went into operation on 9/11, the Bohemian Grove and numerous other topics that the nightly news almost never mentions. Many of the videos (if not all) are being released online for the first time.

Yes, National Review, We Did Execute Japanese for Waterboarding

Yes, National Review, We Did Execute Japanese for Waterboarding
By Paul Begala | Huffington Post

In a CNN debate with Ari Fleischer, I said the United States executed Japanese war criminals for waterboarding. My point was that it is disingenuous for Bush Republicans to argue that waterboarding is not torture and thus illegal. It’s kind of awkward to argue that waterboarding is not a crime when you hanged someone for doing it to our troops. My precise words were: “Our country executed Japanese soldiers who waterboarded American POWs. We executed them for the same crime we are now committing ourselves.”

Mr. Fleischer, ordinarily the most voluble of men, was tongue-tied. The silence, rare in cable debates, spoke volumes for the vacuity of his position.

Now Mark Hemingway of the National Review Online has asserted that I was wrong. I bookmark NRO and read it frequently. It’s smart and breezy — but on this one it got its facts wrong.

Mr. Hemingway assumed I was citing the case of Yukio Asano, who was convicted of waterboarding and other offenses and sentenced to 15 years hard labor — not death by hanging. Mr. Hemingway made the assumption that I was referring to the Asano case because in 2006 Sen. Edward Kennedy had referred to it. (Sen. Kennedy accurately described the sentence as hard labor and not execution, by the way.)

But I was not referring to Asano, nor was my source Sen. Kennedy. Instead I was referencing the statement of a different member of the Senate: John McCain. On November 29, 2007, Sen. McCain, while campaigning in St. Petersburg, Florida, said, “Following World War II war crime trials were convened. The Japanese were tried and convicted and hung for war crimes committed against American POWs. Among those charges for which they were convicted was waterboarding.”

Sen. McCain was right and the National Review Online is wrong. Politifact, the St. Petersburg Times’ truth-testing project (which this week was awarded a Pulitzer Prize), scrutinized Sen. McCain’s statement and found it to be true. Here’s the money quote from Politifact:

“McCain is referencing the Tokyo Trials, officially known as the International Military Tribunal for the Far East. After World War II, an international coalition convened to prosecute Japanese soldiers charged with torture. At the top of the list of techniques was water-based interrogation, known variously then as ‘water cure,’ ‘water torture’ and ‘waterboarding,’ according to the charging documents. It simulates drowning.” Politifact went on to report, “A number of the Japanese soldiers convicted by American judges were hanged, while others received lengthy prison sentences or time in labor camps.”

The folks at Politifact interviewed R. John Pritchard, the author of The Tokyo War Crimes Trial: The Complete Transcripts of the Proceedings of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East. They also interviewed Yuma Totani, history professor at the University of Nevada-Las Vegas, and consulted the Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, which published a law review article entitled, “Drop by Drop: Forgetting the History of Water Torture in U.S. Courts.” Bottom line: Sen. McCain was right in 2007 and National Review Online is wrong today. America did execute Japanese war criminals for waterboarding.


Digg!

How Close the Bush Bullet


Published on Wednesday, March 4, 2009 by Consortium News
How Close the Bush Bullet
by Robert Parry

Earlier this decade when some of us warned that George W. Bush was behaving more like an incipient dictator than the leader of a constitutional republic, we were dismissed as alarmists, left-wingers, traitors and a host of less printable epithets.

But it is now increasingly clear that President Bush and his top advisers viewed the 9/11 attacks as an opportunity to implement a series of right-wing legal theories that secretly granted Bush unlimited power to act lawlessly and outside the traditional parameters of the U.S. Constitution.

These theories held that at a time of war – even one as vaguely defined as the “war on terror” – Bush’s powers as Commander in Chief were “plenary,” or total. And since the conflict against terrorism had no boundaries in time or space, his unfettered powers would exist everywhere and essentially forever.

According to his administration’s secret legal memos released Monday, Bush could waive all meaningful constitutional rights of citizens, including the First Amendment’s protections on free speech and a free press.

John Yoo, a deputy assistant attorney general at the Justice Department’s powerful Office of Legal Counsel – which advises a President on the limits of his constitutional powers – declared that Bush could void the First Amendment if he deemed it necessary to fight terrorism.

“First Amendment speech and press rights may also be subordinated to the overriding need to wage war successfully,” Yoo wrote in an Oct. 23, 2001, memo entitled “Authority for Use of Military Force to Combat Terrorist Activities Within the United States.”

Yoo then added ominously, “The current campaign against terrorism may require even broader exercises of federal power domestically.”

What was particularly stunning about Yoo’s reference to waiving the First Amendment – a pillar of American democracy – was his cavalier attitude. He tossed the paragraph into a memo focused on stripping Americans of their Fourth Amendment “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.”

While saying that Bush could order spying on and military attacks against U.S. domestic targets at his own discretion as Commander in Chief, Yoo added, almost in passing, that the President also could abrogate the rights of free speech and a free press.

Wiping Out Public Trials

Another Yoo memo, dated June 27, 2002, essentially voided the Sixth Amendment and a federal law guaranteeing Americans the right to public trials. In the memo, Yoo asserted that Bush had the power to declare American citizens “enemy combatants” and detain them indefinitely.

“The President’s power to detain enemy combatants, including U.S. citizens, is based on his constitutional authority as Commander in Chief,” Yoo wrote, adding that “Congress may no more regulate the President’s ability to detain enemy combatants than it may regulate his ability to direct troop movements on the battlefield.”

Yoo acknowledged that in “war on terror” cases, an “enemy combatant” may have no formal connection to an enemy group, may have no weapon, and may have no discernable plan for carrying out a terrorist attack. In other words, an “enemy combatant” could be anyone that Bush so designated.

Under Yoo’s analysis, an alleged “enemy combatant” would have no legal recourse, since Bush’s Commander in Chief powers trumped even habeas corpus requirements that the government must show cause for imprisoning someone. Further, this opinion wasn’t just hypothesizing; it provided the legal basis for indefinitely detaining U.S. citizen Jose Padilla.

Though the U.S. Supreme Court ultimately issued a narrow 5-4 decision overturning Bush’s supposed right to deny habeas corpus and punish “enemy combatants” through his own military court system, many of Yoo’s concepts survived in the Military Commissions Act, which was passed by the Republican-controlled Congress in 2006.

While the law appears on the surface to target only non-citizens, fine print deep in the legislation makes clear that the Bush administration still was asserting its power to detain U.S. citizens who were viewed as aiding and abetting foreign enemies and to punish those citizens through military commissions that denied normal due-process rights to defendants.

“Any person is punishable as a principal under this chapter who commits an offense punishable by this chapter, or aids, abets, counsels, commands, or procures its commission,” the law states, adding that “any person subject to this chapter who, in breach of an allegiance or duty to the United States, knowingly and intentionally aids an enemy of the United States … shall be punished as a military commission … may direct.”

The reference to people acting “in breach of an allegiance or duty to the United States” would not apply to Osama bin Laden or al-Qaeda but would cover American citizens.

The Military Commissions Act remains in effect to this day, although President Barack Obama has vowed not to apply it, favoring use of regular civilian or military courts.

Loss of First Amendment

Though some of us have cited Bush’s determination to override key constitutional protections for years (see, for instance, our book Neck Deep), few critics – including me – thought to include the notion that Bush was interested in suspending the First Amendment.

The significance of Yoo’s throwaway paragraph about throwing away the First Amendment is that it suggests that the Bush administration intended as early as October 2001 to act against journalists and citizens who were viewed as undermining Bush’s “war on terror” through public comments or disclosures.

As a right-wing legal scholar, Yoo surely shared the Right’s knee-jerk animosity toward past reporting on the Watergate scandal and the Vietnam War’s Pentagon Papers, as well as contempt for Americans who demonstrated against the Vietnam War.

But his First Amendment reference also may have reflected the thinking of senior Bush aides in those early days of the “war on terror” as they collaborated with Yoo in formulating his legal opinions.

In his 2006 book War by Other Means, Yoo describes his participation in frequent White House meetings regarding what “other means” should receive a legal stamp of approval. Yoo said the “meetings were usually chaired by Alberto Gonzales,” then White House counsel, and involved Vice President Dick Cheney’s legal counsel, David Addington.

So, a seemingly incongruous reference to overriding the First Amendment – in a memo centered on overriding the Fourth Amendment – could be explained by the desire of White House officials to have some legal cover for actions aimed at journalists who were exposing secrets or whose reporting might weaken the national resolve behind Bush’s actions.

It also suggests that Bush’s critics who exercised their free speech rights in challenging his “war on terror” could have become targets of special government operations justified under Bush’s Commander in Chief powers.

In other words, Bush’s assault on America’s constitutional Republic may have been more aggressive than many of us imagined. It was a bullet that came close to the heart of a dream dating back to 1776.

© 2009 Consortium News
Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Neck Deep: The Disastrous Presidency of George W. Bush, was written with two of his sons, Sam and Nat. His two previous books are Secrecy & Privilege: The Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq and Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & ‘Project Truth’.


Digg!

George Bush’s Gift To The World: The End of American Imperialism

Published on Friday, January 30, 2009 by CommonDreams.org
George Bush’s Gift To The World: The End of American Imperialism
by David Michael Green

George W. Bush was unquestionably the worst American president in the two and a quarter centuries of the country’s existence.
After all, James Buchanan, the previous aspirant to the title, merely did nothing while the South seceded. Hah! You’ll have to do better than that, Jimmy, if you want to wear this crown!

Bush did far better, of course. It would appear to be the one thing in his entire life he actually worked hard at, and the one challenge he was able to meet successfully. This was an astonishingly destructive presidency, that’s true even despite the fact that we don’t really know much about his administration, because in addition to being the worst, it was also the most secretive ever. (I’m sure that’s just a coincidence, too.) Moreover, that’s also even considering that most Americans still vastly underestimate the depravity of Team Bush. As I have argued previously, if you think they were ‘merely’ arrogant bunglers with exceptionally bad politics, you’ve grossly underestimated them. In fact, they were predators who launched their class warfare agenda behind the smoke-screen of national security, faux patriotism and secret government.

Does this record of unparalleled devastation mean that Bush never did anything right in eight years? No, though it’s pretty much the case that he never did anything right on purpose.

Unquestionably, however, Bush did make some positive contributions to American life, even if they were completely inadvertent, and even if they were dwarfed by the swath of destruction he left all across the landscape. Put simply, George W. Bush’s greatest success was that he gave a very bad name to very bad things.

Like the Republican Party, for example. Or conservative ideology. Or theocracy. Or presidents with the last name of Bush. Or emotional midgets who seek the White House as a salve for their personal psychological neediness.

We can be grateful for all these contributions, and I certainly am – though “thanks” is not likely what I would say if I had the pleasure of relating my assessment of Mr. Bush to him directly. More likely it would be something closer to the gracious words Dick “Dick” Cheney had for Patrick Leahy early on in the administration, when the two bumped into each other on the Senate floor. Those remarks were not, shall we say, fit for print in a family newspaper.

But I digress.

George Bush left us many gifts, but perhaps the greatest of them is that he has ruined the sport of imperialism in America, maybe forever.

Admittedly, that may of course be wishful thinking. Woe be unto the world, for example, should there be another 9/11 type of event. Somebody somewhere would have to pay in spades, and they likely wouldn’t be nice white folks.

And god only knows, alternatively, what Americans might be capable of under conditions of real resource deprivation. Considering what we’ve already done while being the richest and most powerful country in the world, it’s scary to think of what we could do with our back genuinely to the wall.

But leaving those unusual situations aside, it must be said that, after Iraq, the fun has really gone out of eviscerating small foreign countries, even those foolish enough to locate themselves on top of our oil.

Imperialism used to be a fairly sporting avocation for gentlemen of a certain class. You could occupy hapless Latin American countries, topple Iranian democracies, and simultaneously sponsor apartheid suppression of whole populations, still having time left by mid-afternoon for a couple belts with the boys down at the club, all in celebration of a good day’s work at the office. It was jolly good fun for all. Except, of course, for all for whom it wasn’t.

Unfortunately, that latter category included more or less the entirety of the southern hemisphere, and not a few in the north to boot. But, so what? We’re Americans! Caring about the morality of imperialism is for pre-dictatorship revolutionary anti-colonialist leaders and washed-up European former empires who can’t get it up anymore.

Truth be told, we’re now closer to being in that latter category than not, and we can thank George W. Bush for that, one of the few contributions of this complete and utter disaster going by the name of the 43rd presidency.

I’d say we’re more than a bit lucky for that outcome, too. Imagine if Iraq had been a success. Imagine if it had been the cakewalk they obviously thought it would be. Indeed, one of the great ironies of American politics is that Iraq probably readily could have been a ‘great success’, at least in terms of what could be marketed as such to a foolish American public.

In that sense, we are really quite fortunate, in a perverse sort of way, that Bush was as much a lazy boob as he was a warmonger. We are lucky that Rumsfeld was as dogmatic about his 21 century military ideas as Cheney was a completely psycho amoral sociopath. For had they simply run an occupation that was as carefully planned and as adequately staffed as the invasion, or had they toppled Saddam and then promptly left, “Mission Accomplished” would have been a lot more than some banner duct-taped onto the bridge of an aircraft carrier.

And that would have been very bad news indeed for the rest of the world. Syria, Iran, Venezuela, Cuba – there’s no telling where they might have gone next, and likely with the full support of the American public, at that point popping the buttons off their jingoistic shirts (made in Thailand, of course), their chests puffed out to the wall.

Americans were already growing dubious of regressive exploits in international adventurism, it seems to me. I remember laughing at the senior Bush, whose first pronouncement after defeating the pathetically under-matched Iraqi military in 1991 was “By God, we’ve licked the Vietnam syndrome once and for all!” Yeah, he actually said that. All I could think at the time was, if you have to say it, dude, it ain’t really happenin’. And all I can think now is, out of 300 million people in this country, did we really go to the Bush family twice to staff the presidency?

But, in fact, the Vietnam syndrome had not been licked. That war was a traumatic experience, and it changed public perceptions about the desirability of war itself. On top of which, America was not completely immune to the general Western post-World War II movement away from militarism as a means of settling disputes. Then there’s always been our long-standing vision of ourselves as both peace-loving and anti-imperialistic – however absurd those perceptions often were in light of actual practice. These also provided at least a speed-bump along the road to war in all but the more obvious cases.

Indeed, two things about public opinion and war in America struck me as pretty notable, but not much noted, these last years. One is that there was a surprising – I thought – lack of blood lust after 9/11. I guess part of that was that there was no state enemy to be attacked, as there had been in the past, and part of that was the foregone conclusion that we would be invading Afghanistan. But, really, I’m surprised there wasn’t a far more intense call for revenge. As one measure of the absence of this, consider that Osama bin Laden still has not been captured or killed, almost a decade (!) later, and that nobody seems much to care about that or mention it very often.

The other thing worth noting is that the public was, in fact, dubious about the Iraq invasion, right up until the weeks before. People realized that it was bogus, at some basic level, and they certainly had a hard time connecting it to 9/11. It took a marketing full-court press to eventually garner public support for the war (America’s pathetic excuse for a Congress was a lot easier to roll). It never worked abroad (another reason Americans were a bit slower to come on-board), but in the context of post-9/11 fears, a general tendency to trust the president, and the regressive movement’s prowess at equating militarism with patriotism, the Madison Avenue campaign finally produced a tenuous majority support for the Iraq invasion in the weeks right before it actually went down.

I think it’s slightly encouraging that, even in that context, it still took a real effort to sell the war. It’s also seriously discouraging, on the other hand, that it could be sold, and that it was. But, as noted, this was a tenuous acceptance. Had the war gone well it would have amplified the militarism in the Bush team and the country’s willingness to let them run rampant. Since it went disastrously, it had the opposite effect.

Iraq is probably not the last time America will go to war. But I think it’s fair to say that this country – its nose once more bloodied by a stupid imperial adventure, stupidly prosecuted – will be that much more reticent to repeat the experience. We do learn in America. It is often a painfully slow process, sometimes punctuated by reverse trajectories (can you say ‘creation science’), but we do occasionally exhibit the classic clinical signs of a student who can be taught, however reluctantly and inadvertantly.

And thus we owe a debt of gratitude to the Iraqis, perhaps a million of whom have been murdered, another four or five million dislocated, and countless others wounded – emotionally, if not physically, if not both – for helping us to learn. And the people of Syria and Iran and much of the rest of the developing world owe these Iraqis thanks as well, for giving the US pause from invading other countries at will.

America’s place in the world is likely to be entering a new period now, for several reasons. One is that the low-key successes of the Obama administration will help underscore the sheer lunacy of the Bush years, and all the policies associated with them. Another is that we are rapidly coming face-to-face with the reality that empire is expensive. As our standards of living go from mere steady decline to sheer precipitous decline, you’ll know that we’ve actually turned that corner when mainstream politicians finally have the courage to talk about scaling back expenditures on the obscenely bloated American military machine.

But, in the end, it may truthfully be said that no one did more to discourage American militaristic tendencies than Jingo George, himself, however odd that may seem.

And, who knows? If I ever met him, maybe I could even bring myself to thank him for that, after all.

But only, of course, from above, after I had decked him.

David Michael Green is a professor of political science at Hofstra University in New York. He is delighted to receive readers’ reactions to his articles (mailto:dmg@regressiveantidote.net), but regrets that time constraints do not always allow him to respond. More of his work can be found at his website, http://www.regressiveantidote.net.


Digg!

The Money Masters – How International Bankers Gained Control of America

I wouldn’t call this entertainment, but I guarantee you it’s the best 3.5 hours you’ll ever invest in your education. This amazing 3.5 hour documentary will teach you the entire history of money and banking, how it works and how the central bankers have robbed the wealth of nations, including our own. You’ll discover how bankers create the illusion that they have all the wealth, and how they get governments, corporations and all of us indebted to them, the primary mechanism they use to control virtually everything. You’ll also learn how they are the primary cause of all inflation, start virtually every war, and how they are engineering a world government and monetary system that they alone control…

Also watch FIREWALL: (http://newsbrowser.org/firewall/)

“The powers of financial capitalism had a far-reaching plan, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole…Their secret is that they have annexed from governments, monarchies, and republics the power to create the world’s money”
THE MONEY MASTERS is a 3 1/2 hour non-fiction, historical documentary that traces the origins of the political power structure that rules our nation and the world today. The modern political power structure has its roots in the hidden manipulation and accumulation of gold and other forms of money. The development of fractional reserve banking practices in the 17th century brought to a cunning sophistication the secret techniques initially used by goldsmiths fraudulently to accumulate wealth. With the formation of the privately-owned Bank of England in 1694, the yoke of economic slavery to a privately-owned “central” bank was first forced upon the backs of an entire nation, not removed but only made heavier with the passing of the three centuries to our day. Nation after nation, including America, has fallen prey to this cabal of international central bankers.

Segments: The Problem; The Money Changers; Roman Empire; The Goldsmiths of Medieval England; Tally Sticks; The Bank of England; The Rise of the Rothschilds; The American Revolution; The Bank of North America; The Constitutional Convention; First Bank of the U.S.; Napoleon’s Rise to Power; Death of the First Bank of the U.S. / War of 1812; Waterloo; Second Bank of the U.S.; Andrew Jackson; Fort Knox; World Central Bank;

Also recommended: “Firewall: In Defense of the Nation State”
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=8415519765816415310

Video news on “Federal Reserve”: http://newstree.org/search.jsp?query=Federal+Reserve&hp=10&s=Video&vx=1


Digg!

From Question 9/11.com

From http://www.question911.com/

Movies to make you think. All of these downloadable movies are free. Click the links to be taken to the download page. Latest News
These are highly compressed videos, so if you want to spread the word PLEASE purchase the original DVD versions and support these great filmmakers. These video downloads are shared in the spirit of learning. If you have a problem with us hosting a video which you have rights to, please let us know and we will remove it, however many documentary makers have seen increased sales due to this exposure.
If you have problems playing a video, try Windows Media Player 10. Mac users and others – sorry we can only handle the disk space for downloading one video format, and this one supports the most machines, please try searching Youtube or Google Video. thanks!

9/11 Videos
911 Mysteries The first 9/11 movie designed specifically for the mainstream audience, a theatrical quality movie-length DVD with a full original soundtrack that will rivet you to your seat and blast out of your home theatre system.
Available for purchase in regular box DVD and discount slimpack, buy multiples to share! Feel free to burn copies and pass around, but remember that if we recoup our costs through DVD sales, we will more easily produce Part 2 and Part 3. Send your friends to this website for orders, as much as you can. Gracias, merci, thank you for watching, listening and caring.Listen to what the 9/11 Superstars are saying:
David Ray Griffin “Excellent — the best of the 9/11 movies.”
Professor Steven Jones “Very interesting — more about demolitions than we’ve ever seen.”
James Fetzer “An outstanding contribution to understanding 9/11 — simply superb.”
Filmmaker Aaron Russo: Sofia’s work is superb, especially when you realize this is her first directing job.. she is an upcoming asset to the patriot community and therefore america as well..
Dylan Avery, Director of Loose Change: “Loose Change really is not a very fair representation of the 911 Truth Movement, I’d reccomend…911 Mysteries”
911 Mysteries Web Site [Buy the DVD]
911 Mysteries Part 1 Demolitions 1of3 (WMV 47megs)
911 Mysteries Part 1 Demolitions 2of3 (WMV 47megs)
911 Mysteries Part 1 Demolitions 3of3 (WMV 47megs)
911 Mysteries on Google Video
911 Mysteries_Trailer (WMV 6 megs)
Secret Evil A great quick Overview of the 911 Issues:
Secret Evil of 911 (WMV 12 megs)
911 Made In The USA featuring Loose Change
This is a compilation of 9/11 footage from around the world showing that many around the world are trying to get the message out, and the great lengths the guilty are going to to hide the truth. This DVD includes the full version of Loose Change First Edition by Dylan Avery, along with documentary samples from 911 Eyewitness, Japan, and a German documentary with an exclusive interview with the filmmaker telling how his documentary was suppressed the next day after it was aired. A must see! [Buy the DVD]
911 Made In The USA with Loose Change 1of4 (WMV 47megs)
911 Made In The USA with Loose Change 2of4 (WMV 47megs)
911 Made In The USA with Loose Change 3of4 (WMV 47megs)
911 Made In The USA with Loose Change 4of4 (WMV 47megs)
Loose Change Second Edition is not so much a sequel as a remake of the original with added footage. Also below is Loose Change coverage by Fox News’ New York affiliate that was so popular it shut down their video server on the web. [Official Loose Change Web Site]
Loose Change 2E 1of3 (WMV 47megs)
Loose Change 2E 2of3 (WMV 47megs)
Loose Change 2E 3of3 (WMV 47megs)
Loose Change 2E – Coverage by Fox News 12/01/2005 (WMV 10megs)
Loose Change 2E – Coverage by Fox News12/02/2005 (WMV 9megs)

The popular Loose Change Second Edition video has been gathering worldwide support, and individuals from around the world are chipping in their time to spread the word. Here is the video with subtitles in Chinese, Korean, French, Danish, German, Polish and Swedish. Loose Change has recently been the #1 viewed video on Google Video, and the Korean version was #1 recently as well! The word is spreading worldwide.
Loose Change 2E Chinese Subtitles 1of3 (WMV 47megs)
Loose Change 2E Chinese Subtitles 2of3 (WMV 47megs)
Loose Change 2E Chinese Subtitles 3of3 (WMV 47megs)
Loose Change 2E Korean Subtitles 1of3 (WMV 44megs)
Loose Change 2E Korean Subtitles 2of3 (WMV 45megs)
Loose Change 2E Korean Subtitles 3of3 (WMV 43megs)
Loose Change 2E Danish Subtitles 1of3 (WMV 45megs)
Loose Change 2E Danish Subtitles 2of3 (WMV 45megs)
Loose Change 2E Danish Subtitles 3of3 (WMV 45megs)
Loose Change 2E French Subtitles 1of3 (WMV 45megs)
Loose Change 2E French Subtitles 2of3 (WMV 45megs)
Loose Change 2E French Subtitles 3of3 (WMV 45megs)
Loose Change 2E German Subtitles 1of3 (WMV 45megs)
Loose Change 2E German Subtitles 2of3 (WMV 45megs)
Loose Change 2E German Subtitles 3of3 (WMV 45megs)
Loose Change 2E Polish Subtitles 1of3 (WMV 45megs)
Loose Change 2E Polish Subtitles 2of3 (WMV 45megs)
Loose Change 2E Polish Subtitles 3of3 (WMV 45megs)
Loose Change 2E Swedish Subtitles 1of3 (WMV 45megs)
Loose Change 2E Swedish Subtitles 2of3 (WMV 45megs)
Loose Change 2E Swedish Subtitles 3of3 (WMV 45megs)
911 Eyewitness is a detailed analysis of the sounds of the WTC collapse as heard by a witness on the New Jersey shoreline. This is a stunning video. [Buy the DVD]
911 Eyewitness 1of3 (WMV 48megs)
911 Eyewitness 2of3 (WMV 48megs)
911 Eyewitness 3of3 (WMV 48megs)
Scholars for 9/11 Truth Conference on CSPAN
Alex Jones held a conference on 9/11 issues in Los Angeles which was covered and aired on CSPAN July 29, 2006. On the panel, Professor James Fetzer, Professor Steven Jones, Webster Tarpley and Bob Bowman. Making appearances are Loose Change director Dylan Avery, Jimmy Walters and Barrie Zwicker. Not to be missed – Steven Jones has physical evidence of explosives use at the WTC which he shows during the presentation!
CSPAN Coverage of 911 Truth Conference 07292006 1of4 (WMV 47megs)
CSPAN Coverage of 911 Truth Conference 07292006 2of4 (WMV 47megs)
CSPAN Coverage of 911 Truth Conference 07292006 3of4 (WMV 47megs)
CSPAN Coverage of 911 Truth Conference 07292006 4of4 (WMV 47megs)
Professor James Fetzer on FOX News
Co-Chair of Scholars for 9/11 Truth James Fetzer made it onto the Fox News channel Hannity and Colmes show, and out talked the anchors, including Oliver North.
Professor James Fetzer on Fox News 20060606 (WMV 10megs)
Charlie Sheen on CNN 3 Days in A Row
Movie and TV star Charlie Sheen got a lot of publicity for a phone conversation he had on Alex Jones radio show. A major public figure coming out and asking the tough questions of 9/11 is igniting interest in the truth – bravo! This is TV coverage of the interview.
Charlie Sheen on 911 20060322 (WMV 26megs)
Charlie Sheen on 911 20060323 (WMV 26megs)
Charlie Sheen on 911 20060324 (WMV 42megs)
Professor Stephen Jones of Brigham Young University detailed how the collapses of the WTC were most likely caused by explosives. His astounding story was covered fairly by a local Utah TV station.
Professor Steven Jones on Utah TV News (WMV 7megs)
But on a Cable TV news show, he was treated like a criminal.

License plate frames are seen up to 20 times a day. Click to get yours now!

Professor Steven Jones Shows WTC Demolition Evidence (WMV 29megs)
And here is the footage of the collapse of WTC building 7 they would not show during the interview.
WTC7Collapse (WMV 1megs)
Steven Jones gave a complete talk about his evidence on a Utah school campus. This is his complete analysis of the evidence from his investigation of 9/11.
BYU Professor Steven Jones on 911 Explosives 02012006 1of4 (WMV 47megs)
BYU Professor Steven Jones on 911 Explosives 02012006 2of4 (WMV 47megs)
BYU Professor Steven Jones on 911 Explosives 02012006 3of4 (WMV 47megs)
BYU Professor Steven Jones on 911 Explosives 02012006 4of4 (WMV 47megs)
File 911 Unsolved Willy Brunner and Gerhard Wisnewski were filmmakers contracted by German public television to create this excellent documentary about the unanswered questions of 9/11. Fully approved by management, the day after airing the management said it was full of lies and fired the film makers. Presented in German with English subtitles. See the interview with the filmmaker in “911 Made In The USA”
File 911 Unsolved 1of2 (WMV 48megs)
File 911 Unsolved 2of2 (WMV 48megs)
Face The Facts 911TruthBristol.com presents an excellent compilation of clips from 9/11 documentaries.
Face The Facts (WMV 28megs)
911 Revisited An excellent compilation of original news footage and selected lectures by experts on 911 collapse & explosives usage issues. [Buy the DVD]
911 Revisited 1of2 (WMV 42megs)
911 Revisited 2of2 (WMV 42megs)
Blasted Reality Another excellent compilation of original news footage by Reverend X.
Blasted Reality (WMV 42megs)
The Great Conspiracy News Flash: This news special never appeared on the evening news detailing the oddities of the 9/11 attacks, but it raises some amazing questions that everyone should be asking.
The Great Conspiracy – The 9-11 News Special You Never Saw 1of3 (WMV 48megs)
The Great Conspiracy – The 9-11 News Special You Never Saw 2of3 (WMV 48megs)
The Great Conspiracy – The 9-11 News Special You Never Saw 3of3 (WMV 48megs)
Martial Law Alex Jones brings his bulldog style to the 911 issue in a big way. This video covers 911 issues with tons of references, as well as proof of the new police state that it has allowed to take hold. [Buy the DVD]
Alex Jones – Martial Law 911 1of5 (WMV 48megs)
Alex Jones – Martial Law 911 2of5 (WMV 48megs)
Alex Jones – Martial Law 911 3of5 (WMV 48megs)
Alex Jones – Martial Law 911 4of5 (WMV 48megs)
Alex Jones – Martial Law 911 5of5 (WMV 48megs)
Painful Deceptions An extremely detailed technical analysis of the 911 issues from a scientific viewpoint. [Buy the DVD]
Painful Deceptions DVD Part 1 (WMV 39megs)
Painful Deceptions DVD Part 2 (WMV 42megs)
Painful Deceptions DVD Part 3 (WMV 35megs)
Painful Deceptions Addendum – Technical Details (WMV 29megs)
Painful Deceptions Update – 911 Commission Report (WMV 25megs)
Painful Deceptions Update – Uranium Report (WMV 5megs)
Painful Deceptions Update – Demolition Evidence (WMV 19megs)
911 In Plane Site A groundbreaking documentary, especially for the newcomer, with great footage and unanswered questions. [Buy the DVD]
911 In Plane Site Directors Cut Part 1 Download (WMV 45megs)
911 In Plane Site Directors Cut Part 2 Download (WMV 47megs)
911 In Plane Site Update (WMV 8megs)
David Ray Griffin The first major nationwide TV speech on the 911 issues by the author of “The New Pearl Harbor” and “The 911 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions”. [Buy these Books]
David Ray Griffin Speech on CSPAN2 April 30 2005 Part 1 (WMV 47megs)
David Ray Griffin Speech on CSPAN2 April 30 2005 Part 2 (WMV 47megs)
Confronting The Evidence Jimmy Walters is a millionaire who discovered the 9/11 unanswered questions and created this extensive video, including footage from his live conference of expert speakers on the topics of 9/11.
911 Confronting the Evidence 1of5 (WMV 47megs)
911 Confronting the Evidence 2of5 (WMV 47megs)
911 Confronting the Evidence 3of5 (WMV 47megs)
911 Confronting the Evidence 4of5 (WMV 47megs)
911 Confronting the Evidence 5of5 (WMV 47megs)
September 11th Revisited This excellent collection by Dustin Mugford has no narration or any leading comments, it is simply an excellent collection of evidence for the 9/11 skeptic.[website]
September 11th Revisited 1of2 (WMV 47megs)
September 11th Revisited 2of2 (WMV 47megs)
Whats The Truth This 9/11 video by Doug Brown has some excellent footage.
Whats The Truth 1of3 (WMV 44megs)
Whats The Truth 2of3 (WMV 43megs)
Whats The Truth 3of3 (WMV 41megs)
911 Report Card CSPAN feed of Congresswoman Cynthia McKinneys critical review of the 9/11 Commission Report, touches on many important problems in the 9/11 story but not the demolitions of the buildings.

Cynthia McKinney on CSPAN – 911 report card 1 of 4 (WMV 47megs)
Cynthia McKinney on CSPAN – 911 report card 2 of 4 (WMV 47megs)
Cynthia McKinney on CSPAN – 911 report card 3 of 4 (WMV 47megs)
Cynthia McKinney on CSPAN – 911 report card 4 of 4 (WMV 47megs)
Building the WTC Interesting 20 minute documentary about the construction of the World Trade Center. Notice how much care and attention was given to it’s strength and ability to withstand damage.
Building the World Trade Center (WMV 47megs)

Thank you. We welcome your comments by e-mail Download problems? Please notify us!
Please don’t link people direct to these files, please spread the word by referring people to Question911.com and not the files directly. We have a limited amount of bandwidth each day and must control access to these files to prevent our site from being shut down. Thanks for understanding!

Other Downloads
These video documentaries are not related directly to 9/11 but show a pattern that any thinking person should consider in relation to the power structure which allows crimes like 9/11 to happen and have the truth of them covered up so well. We do not agree with all of the following opinions.
Aerosol Crimes Look – up in the sky – If the information in this well researched documentary is true, we have a lot of things in this world that need to be fixed. Should give us all a lot to contemplate. [Buy the DVD]
Aerosol Crimes 1of3 (WMV 47megs)
Aerosol Crimes 2of3 (WMV 47megs)
Aerosol Crimes 3of3 (WMV 47megs)
Clouds of Death This dramatic brief film looks at the topic above with a bit more conclusion and dramatic effect.
Clouds of Death (WMV 45megs)
The Corporation My vote for the best documentary ever made, this film details the psychological profile of the Corporation, an entity which controls our world, health, information, entertainment, food and political systems. [Buy the DVD] [Rent the DVD]
The Corporation 1of6 (WMV 47megs)
The Corporation 2of6 (WMV 47megs)
The Corporation 3of6 (WMV 47megs)
The Corporation 4of6 (WMV 47megs)
The Corporation 5of6 (WMV 47megs)
The Corporation 6of6 (WMV 47megs)
Walmart After viewing the general nature of The Corporation – watch this specific documentary detailing the efforts of Wal-Mart, the worlds largest retailer to avoid taxes, export jobs, break unions and exploit local health care systems designed for the poor. [Rent the DVD]
Walmart – The High Cost of Low Price 1of4 (WMV 48megs)
Walmart – The High Cost of Low Price 2of4 (WMV 48megs)
Walmart – The High Cost of Low Price 3of4 (WMV 48megs)
Walmart – The High Cost of Low Price 4of4 (WMV 48megs)

Life and Debt After the Wal-Mart documentary shows you the USA side of the outsourcing equation, watch the other side of the coin. The struggles of the third world under increasing massive corporate control of all commerce is studied in this excellent film about the struggles in Jamaica. [Rent the DVD]
Life and Debt 1of3 (WMV 48megs)
Life and Debt 2of3 (WMV 48megs)
Life and Debt 3of3 (WMV 48megs)

Hemp Revolution A ray of hope! This should make you feel better because the solutions for most of the worlds problems are within our reach, but are simply being suppressed by corporate interests, but we can have them if we want them enough. Industrial Hemp is not a drug, has no psychotropic effects, yet it is illegal to grow this natural plant in the USA. Want to know why? It’s all here. [Rent the DVD]
Hemp Revolution 1of3 (WMV 47megs)
Hemp Revolution 2of3 (WMV 47megs)
Hemp Revolution 3of3 (WMV 47megs)

Hoxsey Doctors and the American Medical Association – is their goal to cure you from illness – or are they more interested in maintaining you in sickness? This well documented film has historical footage showing how the AMA tried to close down a cancer clinic curing people daily. Who benefits? [Rent the DVD] Clinic Web Site
How Healing Becomes A Crime 1of3 (WMV 48megs)
How Healing Becomes A Crime 2of3 (WMV 48megs)
How Healing Becomes A Crime 3of3 (WMV 48megs)

Oklahoma City Explosives expert USAF General Benton K. Parton makes his case that the Oklahoma City Federal Building was not demolished by a truck bomb. [Buy the DVD]
General Parton on Oklahoma City 1of2 (WMV 48megs)
General Parton on Oklahoma City 2of2 (WMV 48megs)

Kay Griggs Kay married Colonel George Griggs, a Marine Corps Chief of Staff, as well as head of NATO’s Psychological Operations. He was also, his wife realized, entirely mind-controlled. Kay, a self-declared Christian, became privy to the real workings of the United States military, leadership training, drug-running and weapons sales, and the secret worldwide camps that train professional assassins. Kay Griggs’ report of world events and the power elite paints a picture that begins to explain the hows and whys of our current global scenario. First 2 hours of the 8 hour interview. [Buy the DVD]
Kay Griggs Talks 1of5 (WMV 48megs)
Kay Griggs Talks 2of5 (WMV 48megs)
Kay Griggs Talks 3of5 (WMV 48megs)
Kay Griggs Talks 4of5 (WMV 48megs)
Kay Griggs Talks 5of5 (WMV 48megs)

Credit Cards Why let laws get in the way of corporate profits? This history of the credit card shows how large banks subverted laws against excessive interest rates and low monthly payments used to seduce us into the huge debt loads many of us fall into. Who benefits? [Buy the DVD]
Secret History of the Credit Card 1of2 (WMV 48megs)
Secret History of the Credit Card 2of2 (WMV 48megs)

Orwell Rolls in His Grave – The losing struggle against centralized media control in the US Congress. If 9/11 is such a big lie, why don’t more newspapers and television stations ‘break the story’? Well, a few do, but not many. Why not? One reason – Despite heroic efforts by many Congressmen and Senators to stop it, it now only requires the decision of a few key people to block stories from 99% of US newspaper and television. Do you know that 6 companies now control virtually all of the media, and that they regularly self-censor political investigations by their own reporters? An eye-opening documentary. [Rent the DVD]
Orwell Rolls in his Grave 1of4 (WMV 48megs)
Orwell Rolls in his Grave 2of4 (WMV 48megs)
Orwell Rolls in his Grave 3of4 (WMV 48megs)
Orwell Rolls in his Grave 4of4 (WMV 48megs)

Outfoxed This film concentrates specifically on Fox News and the spinning of lies to support a corporate agenda. [Rent the DVD]
Outfoxed 1of2 (WMV 48megs)
Outfoxed 1of2 (WMV 48megs)

Fox News – OK to Lie This short 10-minute online video recounts the 5-year struggle of 2 Fox News investigative reporters who refused to lie on television for Fox. Their scoop – Monsanto’s artificial Posilac hormone, an engineered growth hormone for cows, is banned in Europe and Canada. But not in the US. Why not? Fox News viewers will certainly never know, because the reporters lost their case against Fox. Why? Because a Florida appeals court ruled that falsifying news isn’t against the law.
Fox News – OK To Lie (Online Google Video)
Television – We Deal in Illusion: In the following short 2 1/2 minute excerpt from the 1976 movie ‘Network’, Howard Beale (famous for “I’m mad as h*ll and I’m not gonna take it anymore”) describes the problem very well.
Howard Beale – Television is a Godd*mned Amusement Park (Online Google Video)
Sweet Misery The FDA would not approve a poison to put on grocery store shelves and in hundreds of products just because a few political favors were pulled in, would they? [Rent the DVD]
Sweet Misery – A Poisoned World 1of3 (WMV 48megs)
Sweet Misery – A Poisoned World 2of3 (WMV 48megs)
Sweet Misery – A Poisoned World 3of3 (WMV 48megs)

Unprecedented Voter fraud – well that’s something that occurs only in backward third world nations, right? The evidence presented by this documentary about the 2000 US presidential elections should make you question the nature of democracy. [Rent the DVD]
Unprecedented – The 2000 Presidential Election 1of2 (WMV 48megs)
Unprecedented – The 2000 Presidential Election 2of2 (WMV 48megs)

Breaking The Silence John Pilger of British ITV channel made this hard hitting documentary about the wars in Iraq and Afganistan, and how 9/11 was used to allow both to happen.
Breaking the Silence (WMV 36megs)
Bush Family Fortunes by Greg Palast follows the history of the Bush family through oil deals and partnerships, on through election abnormalities that were never investigated by the mainstream media in the USA.
Bush Family Fortunes 1of2 (WMV 47megs)
Bush Family Fortunes 2of2 (WMV 47megs)
BBC on Florida Election Results The Florida 2000 presidential election issues are discussed by Greg Palast for the BBC Newsnight show.
Bush Stole The Election BBC Documentary (WMV 47megs)
Bushs Brain is the story of Karl Rove, the top advisor of the president, and how he uses tricks to get his candidates into office by any means necessary.
Bushs Brain-Karl Rove 1of3 (WMV 47megs)
Bushs Brain-Karl Rove 2of3 (WMV 47megs)
Bushs Brain-Karl Rove 3of3 (WMV 47megs)
Conspiracy of Silence This documentary was created for The Discovery Channel, it involved an investigation into high ranking political figures and a child prostitution ring. The cable companies were convinced to cancel the airing at the last minute and destroy all copies. This video tape work print survived.
Conspiracy of Silence 1of2 (WMV 47megs)
Conspiracy of Silence 2of2 (WMV 47megs)
Dick Cheney – The Unauthorized Biography This history of the US Vice President by the CBC channel in Canada reveals the power he has, and who may really be in charge at the White House.
Dick Cheney – The Unauthorised Biography 1of2 (WMV 48megs)
Dick Cheney – The Unauthorised Biography 2of2 (WMV 48megs)
Enemy Image This incredible documentary studies the changes in the relationship between the media covering war, and the governments desire to control the message the people see. Many incredible interviews here – highly recommended.
Enemy Image 1of3 (WMV 47megs)
Enemy Image 2of3 (WMV 47megs)
Enemy Image 3of3 (WMV 47megs)
Falluja – The Hidden Massacre This disturbing documentary by Sigfrido Ranucci examines evidence that the US military used chemical flesh eating weapons called white phosphorus on the people of Falluja in Iraq, even though such chemical weapons were banned, as well as being ostensibly the reason we had to remove Saddam as dictator of Iraq.
Falluja – The Hidden Massacre (WMV 44megs)
Fluoride Deception What is Fluoride, and why is it being added to our water supply in most major cities? This interview with Christopher Bryson is a must watch. [website]
Fluoride Deception (WMV 47megs)
Assassination of JFK Jr John Hankey made this phenomenal documentary discussing the issues surrounding the death of John Kennedy Jr in a small plane crash, Fascinating stuff. [website]
Assasination of JFK Jr 1of4 (WMV 47megs)
Assasination of JFK Jr 2of4 (WMV 47megs)
Assasination of JFK Jr 3of4 (WMV 47megs)
Assasination of JFK Jr 4of4 (WMV 47megs)
JFK II John Hankey also made this great documentary discussing the issues surrounding the shooting of John F Kennedy in Texas – interesting. [website]
JFK II 1of3 (WMV 40megs)
JFK II 2of3 (WMV 40megs)
JFK II 3of3 (WMV 40megs)
Money, Banking and The Federal Reserve The Mises Institute created this short history of the Federal Reserve System, a private corporation which controls the money supply and interest rates in the USA. Where does money come from and how does inflation happen? This is information you need to know.
Money, Banking and The Federal Reserve 1of2 (WMV 41megs)
Money, Banking and The Federal Reserve 2of2 (WMV 35megs)
Monopoly Men This episode of the series Phenomenon Archives studies the shadow government and how the US monetary system allows them to control the country and weaken the control of our elected officials.
Monopoly Men 1of2 (WMV 48megs)
Monopoly Men 2of2 (WMV 48megs)
Panama Deception This Oscar winning documentary covers the secret war in Panama and how the USA controls other countries with military might. Must watch.
Panama Deception 1of3 (WMV 48megs)
Panama Deception 2of3 (WMV 48megs)
Panama Deception 3of3 (WMV 48megs)
Power Of Nightmares This BBC series studies the power of politics, and how the promise of a better world has turned into a promise of safety from danger to make themselves more powerful, and how these threats are simply illusions. Although 9/11 is glossed over in this documentary, the rest of the information is useful regarding the creation of false threats to strengthen control of government and relieve citizens of their freedoms.
Power Of Nightmares 1of6 (WMV 48megs)
Power Of Nightmares 2of6 (WMV 48megs)
Power Of Nightmares 3of6 (WMV 48megs)
Power Of Nightmares 4of6 (WMV 48megs)
Power Of Nightmares 5of6 (WMV 48megs)
Power Of Nightmares 6of6 (WMV 48megs)
Race to Zero Point This inspiring video on new energy is the best documentary available on new energy sources which can powerfully transform our world. It provides a thorough, professional examination of the leading theories and practical inventions that tap into zero point energy, now acknowledged by quantum physicists to exist in all space as a potential source of infinite and accessible electromagnetic energy. Respected engineers and scientists explain in understandable terms how amazing new energy technologies and inventions can go beyond alternative energy to solve the energy crisis on our planet, and how they are being suppressed and ridiculed by the media and large corporations. How far will they go to suppress these breakthrough technologies?
Race to Zero Point 1of4 (WMV 48megs)
Race to Zero Point 2of4 (WMV 48megs)
Race to Zero Point 3of4 (WMV 48megs)
Race to Zero Point 4of4 (WMV 48megs)
Spin This documentary studies the way news spins the truth around political figures, and how they can choose to lock out certain candidates. It’s only news if it’s on television, right? Lots of interesting unseen footage here.
Spin 1of2 (WMV 47megs)
Spin 2of2 (WMV 47megs)
Supermarket Secrets A British documentary series Dispatches covers the reality of the modern supermarket culture, how the look of food is more important than it’s nutritional value, how much visually imperfect food goes to waste, how they use our inability to shop for quality food against us, and how the factory farm affects the animals grown for food. Have you ever wondered why so many non-cooking people watch the food channel? Perhaps it is because they are hungry and not getting the nutrition their bodies are crying for. Very important stuff.
Supermarket Secrets 1of4 (WMV 48megs)
Supermarket Secrets 2of4 (WMV 48megs)
Supermarket Secrets 3of4 (WMV 48megs)
Supermarket Secrets 4of4 (WMV 48megs)
War Party BBC Panorama studies the Neo-Conservative Project for a New American Century (PNAC) and it’s influence over the US government on foreign policy.
War Party 1of2 (WMV 48megs)
War Party 2of2 (WMV 48megs)
Who Controls the Children This presentation by teacher Peg Luksik studies the influences government wields over the teaching of children in public schools, even though it is forbidden to do so, and how this control creates children who do not question authority, making them easier to manage as citizens and employees. Incredible.
Who Controls the Children 1of2 (WMV 48megs)
Who Controls the Children 2of2 (WMV 48megs)
Why We Fight The BBC presents Why We Fight by Charlotte Street, a documentary on the commerce of war, and how the military industrial complex profits so much from war, that it must create wars to continue the growth of it’s business. A classic must-see film.
Why We Fight 1of4 (WMV 48megs)
Why We Fight 2of4 (WMV 48megs)
Why We Fight 3of4 (WMV 48megs)
Why We Fight 4of4 (WMV 48megs)
Diseases Don’t Just Happen Doctor Lorraine Day made this instructional video about the origins of many diseases, including cancer, and how they can be linked to nutrition and other factors.
Diseases Dont Just Happen 1of4 (WMV 47megs)
Diseases Dont Just Happen 2of4 (WMV 47megs)
Diseases Dont Just Happen 3of4 (WMV 47megs)
Diseases Dont Just Happen 4of4 (WMV 47megs)
Why Politicians Can’t Tell the Truth The British series Dispatches covers the election process in Britain, and how the system has changed to use a computer model to target voters in specific regions based on promises that nobody could disagree with, basically making promises they don’t intend to keep, whatever will get them elected, while avoiding the true hard issues that people want them to deal with that will hurt business, cost votors more money and help the environment. Basically it shows that we are offered several identical candidates and no real choice – just like in the USA.
Why Politicians Cant Tell the Truth 1of2 (WMV 48megs)
Why Politicians Cant Tell the Truth 2of2 (WMV 48megs)
World Without Cancer There are more people today making a living on Cancer than dying from it. This documentary by G. Edward Griffin presents evidence that Cancer is a food deficiency of the body. The best line in the documentary is this: “The history of science is the history of struggle against entrenched error.” This movie clearly shows that each health invention was believed to be false by the establishment until they had no option but to call it true, much like the Wright Brothers inventing flight but scientists continuing to claim it’s impossibility. Fantastic documentary.
World Without Cancer 1of2 (WMV 48megs)
World Without Cancer 2of2 (WMV 48megs)
The Money Masters Who issues US Currency? I bet your first answer is the wrong one. Find out how our money was stolen by international bankers in this amazing historical video. NOTE: Video removed by request of the producers, find it anyway you can, it is very important. [Buy the DVD]

The Money Masters – 1of3 (Online Google Video)


The Money Masters – 2of3 (Online Google Video)


The Money Masters – 3of3 (Online Google Video)

–>

New DVDs to Rent
These video documentaries are new and still available through online rental services like Netflix.com – please rent these and view them in full quality.
Why We Fight President Eisenhower warned us about the growing influence of the Military Industrial Complex in 1961 and it’s ability to decide which wars to coerce the government into conducting, wars that are good for business. Very powerful. [Rent the DVD]
Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room Uncontrolled corporate greed toppled the California governor, chose his replacement, and stole billions from the California economy. This is a prime example of corporate control of government via bribes and how the taxpayer eventually pays for it one way of the other. Riveting and very well done. [Rent the DVD]
9/11 By a stroke of chance (or scripting) the French Naudet brothers just happened to be making a film about the nearest firehouse to the World Trade Center and caught the first attack on tape. They were the first on scene and you can see the remnants of bomb blasts in the lobby as they walk in – but a plane had hit that building some 93 stories up? Essential watching for any 9/11 investigation. [Rent the DVD]
Aftermath: Unanswered Questions from 9/11 An excellent compilation of a few of the big questions about the attacks with good supporting interviews. [Rent the DVD]
Fahrenheit 9/11 Well before most of us even thought about 9/11 issues, Michael Moore put this “limited” documentary into theatres and DVD players worldwide, causing millions to seek more information he was required to leave out to get major media attention to the issues. [Rent the DVD]

Books To Read
Confessions of an Economic Hit Man How does the USA control the actions of other countries and allow us to put military bases in 760 locations around the globe and suck up all of the resources each country has to benefit large corporations? Read this book now and it will all become clear.


Digg!

My Immigration Solution

If Mexicans want to be Americans so badly, why not get Mexico to apply for U.S. statehood?
That way, Mexico would abide by the same laws as the U.S. and get the same protections as U.S. citizens. Also, the current proposals by the Republicans & Democrats are unfeasable in effectively dealing with illegal immigration.

Besides, the Southern border of Mexico would be much easier to manage immigration through than the current 2,000+ miles between the USA and Mexico. The U.S. would benefit by having easier access to Mexican resources without having to deal with customs and border issues. NAFTA was essentially created for the purpose of setting a pretext to create a North American Union, similar to the European Union. However, the design of this Union (shaped behind-the-scenes by an elite clique of globalists) robs the U.S. of it’s national sovereignty and civil rights protections. The corporate elites want a pseudo-communist constitution to replace the sovereign constitutions of Canada, Mexico and the USA. The “Amero” is intended to replace all three currencies as well.

If Mexico JOINED the United States before such a Union was completed, it could save us from losing our constitution to the conspirators doing this.